METAPHYSICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS OF THE NEO CLASSICAL ECONOMICS PARADIGM
Abstract
The extent to which neoclassical economics reflects a set of subjective values of Enlightenment thinkers, instead of objective facts, and the context in which it operates are usually neglected. We argue that neoclassical economics, has a two-fold agenda: (i) to provide a technology in order to legitimize capitalist social order according to liberal values and thereby, (ii) justify the liberal ideals of political philosophy. Thus, we strongly reject the claims of its value-neutrality. Liberal society (as legitimized by neoclassical economists) is represented by a model in which each individual exists in an isolated cell of self-interest maximization connected to the rest of society only through voluntary relationships based on exchange of goods andservices. Self-interested individuation and social harmony are seen as mutually reinforcing and, hence, harmonious. The body is seen as the primary instrument dedicated to the only legitimate objective of accumulation for its own sake. On the basis of such a model, perfect competition finds justification as a system that most nearly meets the desire for accumulation. The formation of government to organize society is undertaken by an infallible general-will of the citizens of a society. Thegovernment is supposed to provide a neutral framework within which people can pursue their own preferences based on their own conceptions of the good. The questions of ‘right preferences’ and ‘origin of production technology’ are deliberately avoided to obscure the fact that the preference for preference itself (i.e the preference for accumulation) must be prioritized within capitalist order. Policies are advocated to move the actual world to the ideal world of perfect competition.References
Akram M. Khan (1987), “Methodology of Islamic Economicsâ€, Journal of Islamic
Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 17-33
Ali Ausaf (1990), “In Defense of and a Plea for Islamic Economicsâ€, Universal
Message, (June), 13-21: Islamic Research Academy, Karachi
Ansari Javed Akbar (1989), “The Poverty of Economics (I)â€, Universal Message,
(Feb), 11-18: Islamic Research Academy, Karachi
Ansari Javed Akbar (1989), “The Poverty of Economics (II)â€, Universal Message,
(March-April), 39-48: Islamic Research Academy, Karachi
Ansari Javed Akbar (1990), “The Poverty of Islamic Economicsâ€, Universal Message,
(Feb), 7-10: Islamic Research Academy, Karachi
Ansari Javed Akbar (2001), Maghrabi Tehzeeb, Sheikh Zaid Islamic Centre, Punjab
University, Lahore
Ansari Javed Akbar (2004), “Rejecting Freedom and Progress: The Islamic case
against Capitalismâ€, Jareedah (29), University of Karachi Press
Arrow K. J. (1963), “Social Choice and Individual Valuesâ€, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York
Arrow K. J. (1983), “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare†1951, reprinted
in Collected Paper of Kenneth J. Arrow 1, Social Choice, Cambridge Mass: (Harvard
University Press, 1983)
Baker G. (1965), “A Theory of Allocation of Timeâ€, Economic Journal, 75:229, 493-
Bambrough (1979), Moral Scepticism and Moral Knowledge, Routledge London
Bentham, G. S. (1789) An Introduction to the Principle of Morals and Legislation;
reprinted (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1948).
Black Max (1983), “Why Should I be Rationalâ€, in The prevalence of Humbug and
Other Essays, Cornwell University Press
Blaug M. (1980), Methodology of Economics, Cambridge university press, New York
Clark J. B. (1881), “The Philosophy of Valueâ€, New Englander and Yale Review,
Volume 40, Issue 161: 457-469
Friedman Milton (1953), Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago University Press,
Chicago
Gravelle H. and Rees R. (1994), Microeconomics, 2nd ed., Addison Wesley Longman,
USA
Hamdani Nisar (2004), Religion as a Factor in Time Allocation Problem, Ph.D.
dissertation, Department of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad
Hamdani Nisar and Ahmed Eatzaz (2002), “Towards Divine Economics: Some
Testable Propositionsâ€, The Pakistan Development Review, 41(4), Part II: 609-626
Hammond P. J. (1976), “Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ difference principleâ€,
Econometrica, 44: 793-804
Hare R. M. (1963), Freedom and Reason; (1952) The language and Morals, Oxford
University press
Hayek F. (1978) “Socialist calculation I: The nature and history of the problemâ€,
reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul London
Henderson H. (1991), Paradigms in Progress, Knowledge System Inc. USA
Hodgson G. (1988), Economics and Institutions, Polity Press, Oxford
Jhele A. and Reny P. (1998), Advanced Microeconomic Theory, Addison Wesley
Longman, USA
Kant Immanuel (1962), Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics,
Longman London Kant Immanuel (1787), Critique of Pure Reasoning, translated by
J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Columbia University
Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago
University press
Mill J. S. (1865), On Liberty, Longmans Green and Co., London
Mulhall S. and Adam Swift (1992), Liberals and Communitarians, Blackwell
publishers, Oxford
Nadvi (1994), Classification of Islamic Economic Verses of the Quran, Ph. D.
Dissertation, University of Wales
Popper Karl (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, London and New
York
Popper Karl (1962), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London and New York
Raghbendra Jha (1987), Modern Theory of Public Finance, Wiley Eastern Ltd. India
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press
Raz J. (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford University Press
Robbins L (1935), Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed.,
Macmillan, London (1969, St. Martin’s Press, New York)
Roberts K. W. S. (1980), “Interpersonal comparability and social choice theoryâ€,
Review of Economic studies, 47: 421-439
Robinson Joan. (1969) Introduction to the Theory of Employment, 2nd ed., Macmillan
London
Roy Subroto (1989), Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, London New York
Sandel M. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press
Schotter A. (1997) Microeconomics, 2nd ed. Addison Wesley Longman, USA
Schumpeter J. A. (1954), A History of Economic Analysisâ€, edited by E. B.
Schumpeter, London: George Allen and Unwin
Sen A. K. (1977), “On weights and measures: informational constraints in social
welfare analysisâ€, Econometrica, 45: 1539-1572
Sen, A. K. (1986), “Social Choice theoryâ€, in: K. J. Arrow and M. D. Intrilligator,
eds, Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. III (North Holland, Amsterdam):
-1181
Shahid Naseem (1997), Islami Muashyat, Idar’e Muashyate Islami, Islamabad
Smith Adam (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
New York 1973
Taylor C. (1990), Sources of the Self, Cambridge University Press
Usmani Taqi (1993), Islam aur Jadeed Maeeshat-o-Tijarat, Dar-ul- Isha’at, Karachi
Walras (1874), Elements of Pure Economics, or the theory of social wealth), 1874.
(1899, 4th ed.; 1926, rev ed., 1954, English translation)
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
- Copyright of all the submissions to the Market Forces will remain to the contributors.
- Anyone is allowed to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon his/her work, even commercially, as long as it is credited/cited to the original contributors of the Market Forces.