THE POSSIBILITY OF META-HISTORY

Authors

  • ABDUL WAHAB SURI

Abstract

This paper evaluates the post modernist critique of Enlightenment rationality. It argues that the universal claims of Enlightenment epistemology have been effectively deconstructed. However, a universal rationality is possible and Imam Ibn Khaldun’s work on history provides a basis for explications of universal rationality.

References

Gray J. (1991) Enlightenment’s Wake London, Mentor.

Klinger C (2004) “From Freedom Without Choice to Choice without Freedom†Constellation Vol. 11 No. p 113-129

Korner S. (1954) Kant Harmaondsworth Penguin

Kant E. (1933) “The Idea of a Universal History†in P. Gardner (ed) Theory of History Glencoe Illinois The Free Press p9-39.Catlin R. (1939) Story of the Political Philosophers New York, Knopff.

Foucault M. (1976) “What Is Englightemnet†in Robinov Metal. The Foucall Reader Harmondsworth Penguin.

Descomber V. (1989) Modern French Pholosophy Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Habermas J. (1989) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity Oxford Blackwell.

Lyotard J. (1985) The Post Modern Conditon. Manchester, Manchester University Press.

Megill. A. (1984) Prophets of Extremity Berkley University of Colifornia Press.

Beinsein R. (1989) Beyond Objectivism and Relativism Pitsburgh Univesity of Penn Press.

Gadamer H. (1985) “The Discovery of Prejudice†in Muller R (ed) Hermenutics Reader New York, Continum.

Mulhall R. and A. Swift (1990) Liberals and Communitarians Cambridge Polity

MacIntyre A. (1981) After Virture London Dackworth.

Taylor C. (1990) Sources of the Self Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Ali Basharat (1967) Muslim Social Philosophy Karachi, Jamiyat-ul-Falah Publication.

Rosenthal I. (1988) Political Thought In Melevial Islam Cambrideg, Cambridge University Press.

Wittgenstein L. (1991) Logical Philosophicus London Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01