IMPACT OF TRADE OPENNESS ON OUTPUT GROWTH FOR PAKISTAN: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

Authors

  • Aamir Hussain Siddiqui
  • Javed Iqbal

Abstract

The relationship between trade openness and growth is a highly debated topic. The empirical literature shows that trade openness or liberalization affects output growth. Most of the studies have concluded that the openness of the trade regime has positive relation with GDP growth [Ahmed, Yusuf and Anoruo Emmanuel (2000), Edwards, S., (1998), Edwards, S., (1992), Harrison, A., (1996), Iscan, Talan (1998), Santos Paulino (2002), Wacziarg R., (2001), Yanikkaya Halit (2003)].Pakistan has gradually liberalized its trade regime specially after 1988, when the government accepted the first IMF Structural Adjustment Program. After 1995, this policy gained greater momentum and WTO related compliances have induced Pakistan to reduce import duties and eliminate various subsidies.In this paper we analyze the impact of trade liberalization policy on GDP growth of Pakistan for the period ranging from 1972 to 2002. This paper consists of five sections. The next section reviews the empirical literature on trade openness. Section - 3 describes the model and data sources. Section - 4 reports the estimation results. Final section - 5 concludes the paper.

References

Ahmed, Yusuf and Anoruo, Emmanuel (1999-2000), “Openness and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected ASEANCountriesâ€. The Indian Economic Journal 47, No. 3, page 110-117.

Dicky, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimatorts for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 427-433

Dicky, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979). Liklihood Ratio Statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 1057-1072

Edwards, S., (1992). Trade orientation, distortions and growth in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 39, 31– 57.

Edwards, S., (1998). “Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know?†Economic Journal 108, pp 383– 398.

Engle, R.F and Granger C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: epresentation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276

Harrison, A., (1996). Openness and growth: a time series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 48, 419– 447.

International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics, various issues,

Iqbal J., Tahir M., Baig M. A. (2001), Agregate Import Demand Functions for Pakistan: A co-integration approach, Proceedings 8th Statistics Seminar, University of Karachi pp.217-224

Iqbal J., Baig M. A. And Tahir M., (2002), Exchang Rate Volatility, Imports and Real Output Determination for Pakistan, Pakistan Business Review Vol.4, No.1 pp.31-39

Iscan, Talan (1998), “Trade Liberalization and Productivity: A Panel Study of the Mexican Manufacturing Industryâ€. Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp.123-148

Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical Analysis of co-integrating vectors. Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of Co-integration vectors in Guassian autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580

Johasnsen, S and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood estimation and inference in Co-integration with application to demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210

Santos Paulino (2002), “Trade Liberalisation and Export Performance in Selected Developing Countries†Journal of Developing Economics

Sinha, D. and Sinha, T. (2000), “Openness, Investment and Economic Growth Asiaâ€. The Indian Economic Journal 49, No. 4, page 110-117.

Yanikkaya Halit (2003), “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: a cross country empirical investigationâ€, Journal of Development Economics 72, pp. 57-89

Wacziarg R., (2001) “Measuring the Dynamic Gains from Trade†World Bank Economic Review Vol. 15, No. 3 (2001)

GMM stands for Generalized Method of Movements, which is a method of estimation.

Sinha (2000) follows measure trade liberalization as real exports plus imports

We measured growth of Trade Liberalization as (Exports + Imports)/GDP as used by Sinha (2000). The Exports + Imports is widely used as Trade Liberalization proxy. Wacziarg (2001) has mentioned that a country’s trade to GDP ratio can be viewed as resulting from trade policy.

Downloads