Role of Work Engagement and Job Performance in an LMX Environment
Abstract
The banking environment in Pakistan is quite demanding. Employee motivation level is generally low and turnover intentions are high which has made it difficult for banks to retain talented employees. In view this problem, the study has developed a conceptual framework that has six direct and three indirect relationships. The scope of the study was restricted to the banking sector of Karachi, Pakistan. A self-administered questionnaire was used in the study and the sample size was 220. The results suggest that LMX has a significant effect on creative work involvement, work engagement, job performance and turnover intentions. The study also found that work engagement mediates leader member exchange (LMX) and job performance. Moreover, job performance mediates LMX and turnover intentions while job performance mediates work engagement and turnover intentions. The results suggest that organizations must focus on developing a sustainable LMX environment as it will improve work engagement, job commitment and organizational commitment. This study was restricted to the banking industry of Karachi. Future studies may examine the consequences of LMX in firms based in other cities of Pakistan.Keywords: Job performance, LMX, turnover intentions, work engagement, creative work involvement.References
Adil, M. S., & Awais, A. (2016). Effects of leader-member exchange, interpersonal relationship,
individual feeling of energy and creative work involvement towards turnover intention: A path
analysis using structural equation modeling. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 99-
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational
Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Ansari, M. A., Hung, D. K. M., & Aafaqi, R. (2007). Leader-member exchange and attitudinal outcomes:
Role of procedural justice climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 690-709.
Atwater, L. & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in
creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264-275.
Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from
here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898-925.
Blau, P. M. (1960). Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 178-193.
Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Butt, A. N. (2013). Combined effects of positive and negative affectivity
and job satisfaction on job performance and turnover intentions. The Journal of Psychology:
Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147(2), 105-123.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative
expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48.
Chaurasia, S. & Shukla, A. (2013). The influence of leader-member exchange relations on employee
engagement and work role performance. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior,
(4), 465-493.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and
test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64 (1), 89-136.
Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A. and Gardner, W. L. (2009). Balance in leader and
follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work
attitudesâ€, Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 452-465.
Demerouti, E., Cropanzano, R., Bakker, A., & Leiter, M. (2010). From thought to action: Employee
work engagement and job performance. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and
Research, 65, 147-163.
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of
antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye
toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715-1759.
Eatough, E. M., Chang, C. H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors
with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 619-
Erdogan, B. & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support
as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321-330.
Firth, L., Mellor, D. J., Moore, K. A., & Loquet, C. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention
to quit? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 170-187.
Flickinger, M., Allscher, M., & Fiedler, M. (2016). The mediating role of leader–member exchange:
a study of job satisfaction and turnover intentions in temporary work (2016). Human Resource
Management Journal, 26(1), 46-62.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables
and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory:
Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
Ghosh, R., Reio Jr, T. G., & Bang, H. (2013). Reducing turnover intent: Supervisor and co-worker
incivility and socialization-related learning. Human Resource Development International, 16(2),
-185.
Graen, G. B., Linden, R., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868–872.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in
Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of
leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multidomain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Gutermann, D., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Boer, D., Born, M., & Voelpel, S. C. (2017). How leaders
affect followers’ work engagement and performance: Integrating leader−member exchange and
crossover theory. British Journal of Management, 28, 299-31.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.).
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors:
A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269-277.
Jiang, J. & Yang, B. (2015). Roles of creative process engagement and Leader–member exchange in
critical thinking and employee creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(7), 1217-1232.
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. (2011). Emotional intelligence and leader member exchange: The relationship
with employee turnover intentions and job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development
Journal, 32(3), 260-280.
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in
the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804.
Lee, K., Scandura, T., Kim, Y., Joshi, K., & Lee, J. (2012). Examining leader-member exchange as
a moderator of the relationship between emotional intelligence and creativity of software
developers. Engineering Management Research, 1(1), 15-31.
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and
potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15(1), 47-120.
Lin, W., Ma, J., Zhang, Q., Li, J. C., & Jiang, F. (2018). How is benevolent leadership linked to employee
creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power
distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1099-1115.
Lua, X., Xieb, B., & Guo, Y. (2018). The trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: The
roles of optimism and self-efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 84, 186-195.
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2015). Leader–Member Exchange (LMX)
and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M. & Taylor, M.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social
exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy
of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
Mills, M. J., Culbertson, S. S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Conceptualizing and measuring engagement:
An analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 519-545.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van-Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished
from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475.
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating
expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.
Northouse, P.G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor hindrance stressor
relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454.
Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., Battistelli, A., & Leiter, M. P. (2015). A multilevel investigation on
nursing turnover intention: the cross-level role of leader–member exchange. Journal of Nursing
Management, 23, 754-764.
Rahman, U. U., Rehman, C. A., Imran, M. K., & Aslam, U. (2017). Does team orientation matter?
Linking work engagement and relational psychological contract with performance. Journal of
Management Development, 36(9), 1102-1113.
Rich, B. L., Lepine , J. A. , & Crawford , E. R. ( 2010 ). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
Rowe, W.G., & Guerrero, L. (2011). Cases in Leadership (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Runhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviour:
Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader memember exchange.
Teaching and Teacher Education 30, 99-108.
Salanova, M. and W. B. Schaufeli (2008). ‘A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator
between job resources and proactive behavior’, International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 19, 116-131.
Saeed, I., Waseem, M., Sikander, S., & Rizwan, M. (2014). The relationship of Turnover intention
with job satisfaction, job performance, Leader member exchange, Emotional intelligence and
organizational commitment. International Journal of Learning & Development, 4(2), 113-132.
Saks, A. M. (2006), Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial
Psychology, 21, 7, 600-619.
Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a
short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-
Schyns, B., & Day, D. (2010). Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of
agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
(1), 1-29.
Shan, S., Ishaq, H. M., & Shaheen, M. A. (2015). Impact of organizational justice on job performance in
libraries: mediating role of leader-member exchange relationship. Library Management, 36(1/2),
-85.
Tharenou, P., Donohue, R., & Cooper, B. (2007). Management Research Method. NY, United States of
America: Cambridge University Press.
Tierney, P. (2008). Leadership and Employee Creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity:
The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620.
Tims , M. , Bakker , A. B. , & Xanthopoulou , D. ( 2011 ). Do transformational leaders enhance their
followers’ daily work engagement? The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (1), 121-131 .
Tomprou, M., Nikolaou, I., & Vakola, M. (2012). Experiencing organizational change in Greece: the
framework of psychological contract. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,
(2), 385-405.
Trinchero, E., Elio Borgonovi, E., & Farr-Wharton, B. (2014). Leader–member exchange, affective
commitment, engagement, wellbeing, and intention to leave: public versus private sector Italian
nurses. Public Money & Management, 34(6), 381-388
Burch, T. C. & Guarana, C. L. (2014). The comparative Influences of Transformational Leadership and
Leader member Exchange on follower Engagement. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(3), 224-246.
Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work
performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1),
-74.
Van-Gils, S., Van-Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015).
Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral
attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 190-203.
Van Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work
performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1),
-74.
Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader {member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and
creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.
Walumbwa, F.O., Cropanzano, R. and Hartnell, C.A. (2009). Organizational justice, voluntary learning
behavior, and job performance: a test of the mediating effects of identification and leaderâ€
member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1103-1126.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member
exchange: a social exchange perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
Wilhelm, C. C., Herd, A. M., & Steiner, D. D. (1993). Attributional conflict between managers and
subordinates: An investigation of leaderâ€member exchange effects. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 14(6), 531-544.
Zhang, R. P., Tsingan, L., & Zhang, L. P. (2013). Role Stressors and job attitudes: A mediated model of
leader-member exchange. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(5), 560-576.
Zimmerman, R. D., & Darnold, T. C. (2009). The impact of job performance on employee turnover
intentions and the voluntary turnover process: A meta-analysis and path model. Personnel
Review, 38(2), 142-158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Copyright of all the submissions to the Market Forces will remain to the contributors.
- Anyone is allowed to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon his/her work, even commercially, as long as it is credited/cited to the original contributors of the Market Forces.